Question

A place for discussions not specifically catered for elsewhere
Post Reply
jane-f
Member
Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Wigan

Question

Post by jane-f »

On another forum i go on someone has been having hassle from the police and nabours (sp),when he's taken pictures, when out on the local field with his family and dogs, he was threatened by a bloke who accused him of taking pictures of his house (which he hadn't)

What i would like to know is when do you need to gain permission from people, i know its common curtasy to ask someone if you want to take there picture,
but, but is it actually illegal if you don't ? and if you take pictures whilst out and in some of your picture someones house is in it in the background,
could the person who owns the house have cause for complaint,
this person is now contemplating never taking his camera out again as he's had too much hassle.
User avatar
HarryG
Elite Member
Elite Member
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:18 pm

Re: Question

Post by HarryG »

In a public place, you don't need permission - says harry
sunsworth
Photographer
Photographer
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:12 am
Location: The frozen north
Contact:

Re: Question

Post by sunsworth »

If you are stood on public land - on the street for example - you have the right to take a photograph of anyone or anything you like provided the photograph itself isn't breaking any law - I'm thinking of pornography here. No one has any right to stop you taking their photograph or a picture of their house. You most certainly do not have to get their permission before you do so. Now sometimes of course it's best to adopt a pragmatic approach, there's no point in getting beaten to a pulp by a group of yobs just because you have the right to photograph them if you think it could get nasty. Common sense is sometimes the best approach.

If you are on private land then all bets are off and the landowner is quite within his or her rights to ask you to stop. That's why places such as the Trafford Centre can ask you to stop or leave if you insist on taking photographs inside.

It's interesting that people who object don't seem to mind having their photograph, and that of their children being taken potentially hundreds of times a day by security cameras and reviewed on a screen by God knows who and God knows where.
jane-f
Member
Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Wigan

Re: Question

Post by jane-f »

thanks for that :) ,

its not only security cameras, everyones house is on google earth,
alls you need is a postcode and it will take you directly to the street they live on.
sunsworth
Photographer
Photographer
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:12 am
Location: The frozen north
Contact:

Re: Question

Post by sunsworth »

Google Earth, I can see my old car parked outside the house. Good job I wasn't round the back getting an all over tan! <grin>

But the thing about Google Earth is that it's more or less a one off snapshot, it's not following you around.
User avatar
Ian Austen
Initiate
Initiate
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:20 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: Question

Post by Ian Austen »

Here's a link to a useful pdf file "Photographers rights in the UK"

http://www.sirimo.co.uk/media/UKPhotographersRights.pdf
jane-f
Member
Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Wigan

Re: Question

Post by jane-f »

Ian Austen wrote:Here's a link to a useful pdf file "Photographers rights in the UK"

http://www.sirimo.co.uk/media/UKPhotographersRights.pdf
Thanks for this Ian,
i think its useful to know where you stand in regards to taking photographs when out
and about in public place's.

jane
Wendy M
Initiate
Initiate
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Brighton

Re: Question

Post by Wendy M »

So....... if I take a photo of someone's front window - or part of their living room, from the outside (on the street) - as long as noone is in the room, that would be ok?

:??:
Image
sunsworth
Photographer
Photographer
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:12 am
Location: The frozen north
Contact:

Re: Question

Post by sunsworth »

Yes that would be ok, whether or not anyone is in the window is irrelevant. However, I think it's always useful to consider the person's reaction. You may be in your rights, but is it worth the hassle if they object?
User avatar
bernyM
Initiate
Initiate
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am

Re: Question

Post by bernyM »

The law on photography is quite complex and not altogether clear in all cases. However, as I understand it you can photograph any building from a public place as long as it is not for publication. If you intend to publish it you might need to get the building owner's permission usually using a release form. An exception to this is government or military property where I would advise against any photography whatever.
Interestingly, if you are photographing on private land, (of anything) the owner can prosecute under the laws of trespass but again, there is no actual legislation (to my knowledge) prohibiting photography as such. Also, the owner would have to have posted notices prohibiting photography or explicitly forbidden you to take photographs in order to apply the laws of trespass.
Also, be aware that you could be prosecuted for obstruction whilst photographing in a public place if you are using a tripod.
Note that laws abroad will differ.
8)
User avatar
John
Iconic Photographer
Iconic Photographer
Posts: 5020
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:34 am
Contact:

Re: Question

Post by John »

There is no need for a release form for publication. English Heritage published guidlines for photographers for their Images of England project and it was quite clear that from a public place you can photograph anything.

An obvious exception may well be a military subject, but even then not necessarily.
Best regards

John
Post Reply