Trentham Gardens

A home for images for discussion and appraisal
Post Reply
User avatar
kevinlowe
Elite Member
Elite Member
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 7:28 pm
Spam Protection: Maybe
Location: Leigh
Contact:

Trentham Gardens

Post by kevinlowe »

I spent a really enjoyable day at Trentham Gardens yesterday, in Staffordshire. I can definitely recommend it for a day out with your camera (is there any other kind?)

Just before leaving I took this shot. I can't decide if I like the drama of the sky, or if the highlights are too distracting and take over. I keep changing my mind. Anybody got an opinion? Not just on the sky, but on the picture as a whole.

Oh, and I know, don't start a shot on water. But the only thing in front of the water was a wall, and I was leaning on that :-d
Trentham-Lake-web.jpg
Trentham-Lake-web.jpg (51.24 KiB) Viewed 5583 times
Kevin
User avatar
John
Iconic Photographer
Iconic Photographer
Posts: 5020
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:34 am
Contact:

Re: Trentham Gardens

Post by John »

The composition is good and the sky is pleasing. But I wouldn't go so far as dramatic, it looks a little weak really. If you had some sun on the distant trees it would have helped enormously to give the image more "pazazz" or "bite" - not an easy one with the lighting that you had.

However, I do feel that as a letterbox format the picture can be enhanced. This removes much of the bland water and tightens up the composition. Then perhaps a lift in Photoshop....

If this does look more dramatic on your screen, then maybe check that you are not posting an AdobeRGB image. Images for the forum need to be sRGB to get accurate colours and contrast.
Best regards

John
User avatar
Paul Jones
Iconic Photographer
Iconic Photographer
Posts: 2378
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 5:35 pm
Spam Protection: No
Contact:

Re: Trentham Gardens

Post by Paul Jones »

kevinlowe wrote: I can't decide if I like the drama of the sky, or if the highlights are too distracting and take over.
The highlights aren't too distracting for me, but if you shot in RAW you could try processing the same file twice to eliminate them, ie:

- open the RAW file slighly underexposed so the highlights aren't noticeable
- then open the same RAW file this time with correct exposure
- paste one on top of the other and use a layer mask to show/hide the parts you like
Paul
================
http://www.PaulJones.org


"As usual Paul is absolutely correct."
"In short, Paul is an absolutely brilliant mentor."
User avatar
kevinlowe
Elite Member
Elite Member
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 7:28 pm
Spam Protection: Maybe
Location: Leigh
Contact:

Re: Trentham Gardens

Post by kevinlowe »

Thanks for the comments and advice. Here's the pic in a letterbox format, I think you're right that it makes a more pleasing image. I've decided I do like the highlights, especially in this format.
I'll go away and try working on them though, just to see what what I can get from it.
Trentham-Lake-web-lbox.jpg
Trentham-Lake-web-lbox.jpg (35.68 KiB) Viewed 5561 times
Kevin
User avatar
John
Iconic Photographer
Iconic Photographer
Posts: 5020
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:34 am
Contact:

Re: Trentham Gardens

Post by John »

I think that's much better.
Best regards

John
User avatar
pammie
Master Photographer
Master Photographer
Posts: 359
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:37 pm

Re: Trentham Gardens

Post by pammie »

I am not bothered if the image "starts on water", but what I do think looks odd (which you hadn't done anyway) was to have some boulders for example and half chop them off at the bottom. Either have them in or not.

I do think the letterbox format suits better.

cheers
User avatar
Tracey McGovern
Iconic Photographer
Iconic Photographer
Posts: 1237
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:09 pm
Location: Hindley
Contact:

Re: Trentham Gardens

Post by Tracey McGovern »

Hi Kevin

Yes - much much better and you have brought out some lovely colours and detail in the trees on the left.

Tracey
Post Reply